It is believed to the serif of a 1 from the left side of the top of the 2. There may have been some tooling done to the die, but that does not disqualify the die as being an overdate.Īnd yes, the coin shown is a genuine 1942/41-D dime. ![]() There is some uncertainty as to why this is so, since the bottom of the 41 hubbing can be seen under the 42. The D mint overdate has a much weaker 1 under the 2 that the P mint coin. Were all these dates and mint marks affixed at the P mint?īack then all dies were hubbed and mint marked (if appropriate) at the Philadelphia Mint. So the 2/1-D is the 2/1-P with most of the 1 tooled-out on the die.ĮDIT: Well, now that I think about it, not exactly that, but it's a worked die.ĮDIT: I think I used to know the answer to this. The coin posted looks like the real thing to me.Īh. ![]() I think you might be confusing the 1942/1 P mint (with an obvious 1 under the 2 in the date) and the 1942/1 D mint (which does not display the 1 under the 2 in the date). What are you seeing that makes you think it should retail for more? This doesn't look anything like the 2/1s I've seen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |